LOGIC II

Does anyone deny that statements, verbal or written, do not occur in a vacuum, but rather within a context and derive their meaning from that context?

LOGIC I

Does anyone deny that logic has simple, basic, fundamental rules which any reasonably functional person can master?

ENVY and EMULATE VII 1/2

Does anyone deny that 364/5 days of "envy and emulate" are necessary to provide substance to the rhetoric of that grand day of celebration just past?

ENVY and EMULATE VI 1/2

Does anyone deny that mandating every IPO allocate a certain percentage of the issuance to the now “arbitrarily excluded” class and supercomputer randomly selecting from those of the class submitting an offer to purchase the IPO is feasible and would vastly increase the percentage of citizens directly participating in and thus having a direct stake in our economy ... more equal ... envy and emulate?


HAPPY BIRTHDAY USA!!!

ENVY and EMULATE V 1/2

Does anyone deny that if every person now in that class of people who now are arbitrarily excluded from participating in IPOs were guaranteed at least a possibility of being included in 100 per cent of the IPOs, and some, in fact, would be so included, virtually that entire class would feel more a part of the economic fabric of this society, would feel more “equal”, and non-nationals would be more likely to envy and want to emulate this society?

ENVY and EMULATE IV 1/2

Does anyone deny that citizens are treated unequally when they are arbitrarily denied participation, if only certain citizens are able to participate, in what are basically and fundamentally public business matters such as a standard terms for business loans and investment opportunities such as initial public offerings (IPOs) ?

ENVY and EMULATE III 1/2

Does anyone deny that "envy and emulate" are inversely related to the gap between rhetoric and substantive actuality?