Friday, May 29, 2009

RIPPLES I

Does anyone deny that ripples from a regional tennis championship travel far?

Thursday, May 28, 2009

BP IV / POOR ME II

Does anyone deny that any blogger who would write a chronic back pain poor me really, really sucks?

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

BP III / POOR ME I


Does anyone deny that any blogger who would write a back pain poor me sucks?

BPII

Does anyone deny that chronic back problems really, really suck?

Friday, May 22, 2009

BP I

Does anyone deny that back problems suck?

Thursday, May 21, 2009

HETERONYMS I

Does anyone deny that heteronyms, words that are spelled identically but have different meanings when pronounced differently, while not ideal, are tolerable?

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY X

Does anyone deny that, given the advances made in supercomputing capability in the last half of the last century, it is not unreasonable to expect before the end of this century computer modeling capabilities for accurately measuring an individual's level of work performance?

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY IX

Does anyone deny that, given the advances made in supercomputing capability in the last half of the last century, it is not unreasonable to expect before the end of this century computer modeling capabilities for accurately identifying an individual's interests and skill capabilities?

Monday, May 18, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY VIII

Does anyone deny that assuring an individual is able to perform in a work environment at a very high level for their entire career is to match the individual's interests and skill capabilities to the demands of the work activity?

Friday, May 15, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY VII

Does anyone deny that for an economic equality scheme to function properly it would be important to place a person in a work environment in which they could excel within the limits of that individual?

Thursday, May 14, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY VI

Does anyone deny that people would feel more equal if their pay was based on their level of performance, that is if everyone had the same base pay, and the actual pay they received was equal to the level of their performance - 90 per cent pay for 90% performance, and so on?

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY V

Does anyone deny that "utopian", "literal as a three year old" economic equality would include having everyone receive exactly the same income.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY IV

Does anyone deny that if a policy of economic equality would maximize gnp it should be the policy of choice?

Monday, May 11, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY III

Does anyone deny that gnp is directly related to worker motivation?

Friday, May 8, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY II

Does anyone deny that an "economic equality" economic system would be the best economic system if it produced the greatest worker motivation?

Thursday, May 7, 2009

ECONOMIC EQUALITY I

Does anyone deny that utopian equality includes economic equality?

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

IMMIGRATION VII

Does anyone deny that loss of jobs to illegal immigrants greatly disproportionately impacts the lower economic classes of this society.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

IMMIGRATION VI

Does anyone deny that an important factor in setting the yearly maximum number (y-m-n) immigration quota for a society is the impact on the society of the loss of job opportunities to other members of the society?

Monday, May 4, 2009

IMMIGRATION V

Does anyone deny that illegal immigrants either compromise the immigration policy yearly-maximum-number limitation of a society, or deny immigration to someone who otherwise would have been granted immigration?

Friday, May 1, 2009

IMMIGRATION IV

Does anyone deny that it is reasonable immigration policy to specifically exclude certain types of individuals, for example terrorists and those having a communicable disease?