HATE CULTURE VI

Does anyone deny that the fact of nearly a half century of oppression, suppression, and exploitation is hard evidence of the existence of at least a micro-hate-culture in the society?

TIMELESS II

Does anyone deny that "what did they know, and when did they know it" is veritably timeless?

TIMELESS I

Does anyone deny that "oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive" is timeless?

SWEAT EQUITY II

Does anyone deny that sweat equity encompasses intellectual as well as manual efforts?

SWEAT EQUITY I

Does anyone deny that there is scant difference, if any, between sweat equity and hard cold cash earned equity?

HATE CULTURE V

Does anyone deny that the hate culture rogues gallery includes those who wrap their evil in a religiosity cloak?

HATE CULTURE IV

Does anyone deny that a virtual trademark of a hate culture is prostitution of otherwise legitimate activities for evil purposes?

HATE CULTURE III

Does anyone deny that when bureaucrats oppress, suppress, and exploit one or more citizens, particularly when it serves a selfish private agenda, they are a micro hate culture?

HATE CULTURE II

Does anyone deny that a hate culture can exist on other than a national scale?

HATE CULTURE I

Does anyone deny that the nazis regime, fascism, was a hate culture?

ISMs I

Does anyone deny that black racism is as offensive as white racism?

STRESS KILLS I

Does anyone deny that stress kills?

BEAR FALSE WITNESS III

Does anyone deny that malevolent machinations and contrivances bear false witness per se?

GEEZER VACATION I

Does anyone deny, given an extra blog on July 4th (a Saturday), 5 days of baseball watching totaling all or part of 13 games, and a slight ham string pull, (think poor me), that a geezer is entitled to one day of "vacation"?

LOGIC IV

Does anyone deny that logic and emotion can co-exist in peace and even harmony?

LOGIC III

Does anyone deny that logic and the thou shalt not bear false witness commandment are joined at the hip?

LOGIC II

Does anyone deny that statements, verbal or written, do not occur in a vacuum, but rather within a context and derive their meaning from that context?

LOGIC I

Does anyone deny that logic has simple, basic, fundamental rules which any reasonably functional person can master?

ENVY and EMULATE VII 1/2

Does anyone deny that 364/5 days of "envy and emulate" are necessary to provide substance to the rhetoric of that grand day of celebration just past?

ENVY and EMULATE VI 1/2

Does anyone deny that mandating every IPO allocate a certain percentage of the issuance to the now “arbitrarily excluded” class and supercomputer randomly selecting from those of the class submitting an offer to purchase the IPO is feasible and would vastly increase the percentage of citizens directly participating in and thus having a direct stake in our economy ... more equal ... envy and emulate?


HAPPY BIRTHDAY USA!!!

ENVY and EMULATE V 1/2

Does anyone deny that if every person now in that class of people who now are arbitrarily excluded from participating in IPOs were guaranteed at least a possibility of being included in 100 per cent of the IPOs, and some, in fact, would be so included, virtually that entire class would feel more a part of the economic fabric of this society, would feel more “equal”, and non-nationals would be more likely to envy and want to emulate this society?

ENVY and EMULATE IV 1/2

Does anyone deny that citizens are treated unequally when they are arbitrarily denied participation, if only certain citizens are able to participate, in what are basically and fundamentally public business matters such as a standard terms for business loans and investment opportunities such as initial public offerings (IPOs) ?

ENVY and EMULATE III 1/2

Does anyone deny that "envy and emulate" are inversely related to the gap between rhetoric and substantive actuality?